Hi Hugh, On Thursday 17 November 2005 20:38, Hugh Dickins wrote: > It's strange enough to be looking out for anonymous pages in VM_UNPAGED > areas, let's not insert the ZERO_PAGE there - though whether it would > matter will depend on what we decide about ZERO_PAGE refcounting. We do we refcount ZERO_PAGE at all? Ok, there may be multiple, but they exist always and always at the same physical addresses, right? So why do we care at all? Memory hotplug? Doesn't it suffice there, that they are reverse mappable? Aren't they a perfect candidate for a VM_UNPAGED from /dev/zero :-) Regards Ingo Oeser
Attachment:
pgpvItABEkLxo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 09/11] unpaged: ZERO_PAGE in VM_UNPAGED
- From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 09/11] unpaged: ZERO_PAGE in VM_UNPAGED
- References:
- [PATCH 00/11] unpaged: PageReserved VM fixups
- From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 09/11] unpaged: ZERO_PAGE in VM_UNPAGED
- From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 00/11] unpaged: PageReserved VM fixups
- Prev by Date: Re: Laptop mode causing writes to wrong sectors?
- Next by Date: Re: USB key generates ioctl_internal_command errors
- Previous by thread: [PATCH 09/11] unpaged: ZERO_PAGE in VM_UNPAGED
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 09/11] unpaged: ZERO_PAGE in VM_UNPAGED
- Index(es):