On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 15:37 -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > (Although every release we seem to trade one set of > working sound drivers for a new set of broken ones). Because the ALSA project does not have access to the wide variety of hardware required to regression test every sound driver change. People like Red Hat and OSDL do, but they don't help. I always figured that this was because those entities consider audio support a low priority. Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] userland swsusp
- From: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
- Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] userland swsusp
- From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
- Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] userland swsusp
- References:
- RE: [linux-pm] [RFC] userland swsusp
- From: "Gross, Mark" <mark.gross@intel.com>
- Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] userland swsusp
- From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
- Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] userland swsusp
- From: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@cyclades.com>
- Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] userland swsusp
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
- Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] userland swsusp
- From: Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com>
- Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] userland swsusp
- From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
- Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] userland swsusp
- From: Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com>
- Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] userland swsusp
- From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
- Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] userland swsusp
- From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
- RE: [linux-pm] [RFC] userland swsusp
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 02/11] unpaged: private write VM_RESERVED
- Next by Date: Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] userland swsusp
- Previous by thread: Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] userland swsusp
- Next by thread: Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] userland swsusp
- Index(es):
![]() |