Re: [patch -rt] make gendev_rel_sem a compat_semaphore

On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 08:08 -0800, Daniel Walker wrote:
> How would you feel if we move this lock to a completion() . It's such a
> small lock, and completions are faster anyway .. It might be a good test
> bed for some other compat locks .

I feel fine with that.  Looking at the code a little, this might be a
change for mainline.

You want to do it, or do you want me?

-- Steve


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch -rt] make gendev_rel_sem a compat_semaphore
    • From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch -rt] make gendev_rel_sem a compat_semaphore
    • From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch -rt] make gendev_rel_sem a compat_semaphore
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Calibration issues with USB disc present.
• Next by Date: Re: PCI: remove bogus resource collision error
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch -rt] make gendev_rel_sem a compat_semaphore
• Next by thread: fast communication problem
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]