Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] userland swsusp

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, Greg KH wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 05:54:37PM +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 07:10:52PM +0000, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > What unstable implementation? swsusp had very little regressions over past
> > > year or so. Drivers were different story, but nothing changes w.r.t. drivers.
> >
> > Do you mean swsusp is actually supposed to work?  Suspend-to-ram,
> > suspend-to-disk or both?
>
> Both.  -to-ram depends on your video chip, but to-disk should work just
> fine.  If not, please report bugs.

swsusp has nothing to do with suspend-to-ram. swsusp is a
platform-independent implementation of suspend-to-disk. STR is
very-platform dependent. Please see the file:

	Documentation/power/states.txt

for more info.


	Pat

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux