On Wednesday 16 November 2005 21:46, Wed, 16 Nov 2005 21:46:05 +0100 wrote:
> El Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:03:34 -0500,
> Benjamin LaHaise <[email protected]> escribió:
>
> > We could implement a stack guard page for the transition period, so that
>
> CONFIG_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW doesn't do that but it looks useful too.
>
> Does CONFIG_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW harm performance a lot? (doesn't
> look like that for a newbie's eye)
No, it's very cheap. In fact it could be probably enabled by default.
-Andi
P.S.: Can you please chose a less irritating realname?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
