On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 17:20, liyu wrote:
> I fixed it. we should insert code start of enqueue_task():
>
> static void enqueue_task(struct task_struct *p, prio_array_t *array)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&(task_rq(p)->keep_lock), flags);
> if (p->flags & PF_KEEPOVER) {
> list_del(&p->run_list);
> p->state = TASK_RUNNING;
> p->flags &= ~PF_KEEPOVER;
> }
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&(task_rq(p)->keep_lock), flags);
>
> ....
> }
> However, this patch still have problem, it may lock entire system.
>
> I am trying to catch this bug~.
The obvious bug is that there are places that expect a task to be added to the
run list after it has called enqueue_task and you've broken that expectation.
The locking in the rest of your patch did not look too robust, but I don't
have time to review it sorry.
Cheers,
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
