On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 21:36 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hmm... it is hard to judge a patch without context. Anyway, can't we
> get process snasphot/resume without virtualizing pids? Could we switch
> to 128-bits so that pids are never reused or something like that?
That might work fine for a managed cluster, but it wouldn't be a good
fit if you ever wanted to support something like a laptop in
disconnected operation, or if you ever want to restore the same snapshot
more than once. There may also be some practical userspace issues
making pids that large.
I also hate bloating types and making them sparse just for the hell of
it. It is seriously demoralizing to do a ps and see
7011827128432950176177290 staring back at you. :)
-- Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
