Re: [RFC] [PATCH 00/13] Introduce task_pid api

[Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>]

On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 15:22 +0000, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > @@ -2925,7 +2925,7 @@ void submit_bio(int rw, struct bio *bio)
> >  	if (unlikely(block_dump)) {
> >  		char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
> >  		printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s(%d): %s block %Lu on %s\n",
> > -			current->comm, current->pid,
> > +			current->comm, task_pid(current),
> >  			(rw & WRITE) ? "WRITE" : "READ",
> >  			(unsigned long long)bio->bi_sector,
> >  			bdevname(bio->bi_bdev,b));
> 
> ...and now printk is close to useless, because uer can't know to which
> pidspace that pid belongs. Oops.

That is true, but only if we print the virtualized pid.  Before we go
and actually implement the pid virtualization, we probably need a
thorough audit of this kind of stuff to see what we really want.

There will always be a "real pid" (the real thing in tsk->__pid) backing
whatever is virtualized and presented to getpid().  I would imagine that
this is the same that needs to go into dmesg.  

-- Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/