On 16 Nov 2005 08:48:39 +0100, Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Magnus Damm <[email protected]> writes:
> >
> > For testing, your NUMA emulation code is perfect IMO. But for memory
> > resource control your NUMA emulation code may be too simple.
> >
> > With my patch, CONFIG_NUMA_EMU provides a way to partition a machine
> > into several smaller nodes, regardless if the machine is using NUMA or
> > not.
> >
> > This NUMA emulation code together with CPUSETS could be seen as a
> > simple alternative to the memory resource control provided by CKRM.
>
> I believe Werner tried to use it at some point for that and it just
> didn't work very well. So it doesn't seem to be very useful for
> that usecase.
Sorry, but which one did not work very well? CKRM memory controller or
NUMA emulation + CPUSETS?
Thanks,
/ magnus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
