Re: [PATCH 1/1] Added support of ST m41t85 rtc chip

On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 12:48:59AM +0300, Andrey Volkov wrote:

<snip>

> > 
> > Mark, care to comment on that possibility, and/or on the code itself?
> > 
> And, please, remove unnecessary PPC dependence from Kconfig.

When I originally submitted the m41t00 patch, I made it clear that it
was PPC only and gave the reason why:

http://archives.andrew.net.au/lm-sensors/msg29280.html

What processor arch did you test your m41t85 driver on?
AFAICT, PPC is the only arch that uses that exact definition of
get/set_rtc_time().

Mark
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 1/1] Added support of ST m41t85 rtc chip
    • From: Andy Isaacson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/1] Added support of ST m41t85 rtc chip
    • From: Andrey Volkov <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 1/1] Added support of ST m41t85 rtc chip
    • From: Andrey Volkov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/1] Added support of ST m41t85 rtc chip
    • From: Jean Delvare <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/1] Added support of ST m41t85 rtc chip
    • From: Andrey Volkov <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: userspace block driver?
• Next by Date: Re: pfn_to_nid under CONFIG_SPARSEMEM and CONFIG_NUMA
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Added support of ST m41t85 rtc chip
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Added support of ST m41t85 rtc chip
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]