Re: [Patch 1/4] Delay accounting: Initialization

On Nov 15, 2005, at 7:45 PM, Shailabh Nagar wrote:

So how about this:

Have /proc/sys/kernel/delayacct and a corresponding kernel boot parameter (for setting the switch early) which control just the collection of data. Allocation always happens.

Yep, if per task isn't worth doing that sounds reasonable.

Parag
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [Patch 1/4] Delay accounting: Initialization
    • From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch 1/4] Delay accounting: Initialization
    • From: Parag Warudkar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch 1/4] Delay accounting: Initialization
    • From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch 1/4] Delay accounting: Initialization
    • From: Parag Warudkar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch 1/4] Delay accounting: Initialization
    • From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/5] Light Fragmentation Avoidance V20: 003_fragcore
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Added support of ST m41t85 rtc chip
• Previous by thread: Re: [Patch 1/4] Delay accounting: Initialization
• Next by thread: [Patch 3/4] Delay accounting: Page fault delays
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]