Re: [PATCH]small fix for __ipv6_addr_type(...)

In article <[email protected]> (at Tue, 15 Nov 2005 17:20:50 -0500), Vlad Yasevich <[email protected]> says:

> No, according to RFC 4007, loopback is considered a link-local
> address.

Agreed. RFC3484 also explicitly says that loopback is treated as link-local.

--yoshfuji
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH]small fix for __ipv6_addr_type(...)
  - From: Yan Zheng <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH]small fix for __ipv6_addr_type(...)
  - From: Vlad Yasevich <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [Patch 1/4] Delay accounting: Initialization
Next by Date: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 00/13] Introduce task_pid api
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH]small fix for __ipv6_addr_type(...)
Next by thread: [PATCH] remove enable_irq_nosync
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]