Re: [RFC] [PATCH 00/13] Introduce task_pid api

[Hubertus Franke <frankeh@watson.ibm.com>]

Paul Jackson wrote:
> I don't think that the checkpoint/restart/relocation design should be
> driven by mico-optimizations of getpid().  It needs to be driven by
> a design that addresses (for better or worse) the many larger questions
> encountered in such an effort.

Neither did we suggest one.
My note, was simply addressing some of the issues that were thrown out
with the alternative articulated in the many responses.

-- Hubertus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/