Re: [PATCH 03/05] mm rationalize __alloc_pages ALLOC_* flag names

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Paul Jackson wrote:
> > Rationalize mm/page_alloc.c:__alloc_pages() ALLOC flag names.
> > 
> 
> I don't really see the need for this. The names aren't
> clearly better, and the downside is that they move away
> from the terminlogy we've been using in the page allocator
> for the past few years.

I thought they were heaps better, actually.

-#define ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS	0x01 /* don't check watermarks at all */
-#define ALLOC_HARDER		0x02 /* try to alloc harder */
-#define ALLOC_HIGH		0x04 /* __GFP_HIGH set */
+#define ALLOC_DONT_DIP	0x01 	/* don't dip into memory reserves */
+#define ALLOC_DIP_SOME	0x02 	/* dip into reserves some */
+#define ALLOC_DIP_ALOT	0x04 	/* dip into reserves further */
+#define ALLOC_MUSTHAVE	0x08 	/* ignore all constraints */

very explicit.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux