Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Robert Hancock wrote:

Jeff V. Merkey wrote:

What? There's more kernel apps than just ndis network drivers that get ported. ndiswrapper is busted (which is used for a lot of laptops)
without 4K stacks.


Which is why ndiswrapper needs to get fixed to work with 4K stacks. ndiswrapper is the thing that's doing the wierd stuff, it needs to adapt to the kernel, not the other way around. The reasons to use 4K stacks are strong enough that they are not made up for by the fact that ndiswrapper currently would like to have more stack space.

The NDIS drivers require the 8K stack, not ndiswrapper.


Windows apparently has 12K of kernel stack for drivers.. in that case even 8K of stack in Linux would not necessarily be enough. If ndiswrapper wants to run Windows code in the kernel with any amount of reliability it should be providing its own stack which is the size that the code expects.

My laptop is a Compaq and there isn't a Linux driver for the wireless. I also discovered Fedora Core 4 won't install
on a Compaq Presario with SATA (stacks crashes).


How do you know this is related to the stack? Did you report this as a bug?


Because I use MDB, a kernel debugger I wrote that inserts beneath Linux via DRLX or inside of it, and I watched it crash in the Linux SCSI code. There's code in Linux proper that also walks off the end of the stack. No I did not report it. But now I have.

Jeff

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux