Does anyone undefine APM_RELAX_SEGMENTS?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rohit Seth wrote:

On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 00:23 -0800, [email protected] wrote:
The patch titled

    x86: Always relax segments

has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is

    x86-always-relax-segments.patch


From: Zachary Amsden <[email protected]>

APM BIOSes have many bugs regarding proper representation of the appropriate
segment limits for calling the BIOS.  By default, APM_RELAX_SEGMENTS is always
turned on to support running the APM BIOS on these buggy machines.  Keeping
64k limits poses very little danger to the kernel, because the pages where the
APM BIOS is located will always be in low physical memory BIOS areas, which
should already be marked reserved, and only buggy BIOSes would possibly
overstep the segment bounds with writes to data anyway.

Since forcing stricter limits breaks many machines and is not default
behavior, it seems reasonable to deprecate the older code which may cause APM
BIOS to fault.


But I presume it make some other machines to work?

It would make the APM thread panic on machines with broken APM BIOS - which is not very useful except for proving a BIOS bug. But APM is inherently safer than PnP, since there is no transfer segment which can corrupt arbitrary kernel memory.

In the history of its introduction, I can not find a single distribution or use which undefines this macro. If anyone knows otherwise, please advise.

Zach
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux