Mr Linux,
On Monday 14 November 2005 13:03, [email protected] wrote:
> This is very interesting data, thank you!
> This is using the standard IDE driver?
> And the path names were absolute?
Yes. No.
>
> What would be really nice is a full trace of the locks acquired so we
> can look for specific problems. (I can see the OpenSolaris folks puffing
> up to crow about dtrace already.)
> Barring that, a few variants like hot-cache cases, different file systems
> (includig tmpfs), and different device drivers would be informative.
> (You could also try the different ext3 journalling modes.)
I have no plans to generate such data right now, but if you want to
do it yourself I can send you my patches as a starting point. Should be easy enough
using relayfs.
> I'm not sre quite how you did this, but assuming you just installed global
> counters via macros
per process counters.
> and ran the test by booting with init=
from a normal shell in a running system
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
