On Dinsdag 15 November 2005 00:30, [email protected] wrote:
> diff -puN include/asm-powerpc/unistd.h~perfmon2-reserve-system-calls include/asm-powerpc/unistd.h
> --- 25/include/asm-powerpc/unistd.h~perfmon2-reserve-system-calls Mon Nov 14 15:27:32 2005
> +++ 25-akpm/include/asm-powerpc/unistd.h Mon Nov 14 15:27:32 2005
> @@ -296,8 +296,20 @@
> #define __NR_inotify_init 275
> #define __NR_inotify_add_watch 276
> #define __NR_inotify_rm_watch 277
> +#define __NR_pfm_create_context 278
> +#define __NR_pfm_write_pmcs 279
> +#define __NR_pfm_write_pmds 280
> +#define __NR_pfm_read_pmds 281
> +#define __NR_pfm_load_context 282
> +#define __NR_pfm_start 283
> +#define __NR_pfm_stop 284
> +#define __NR_pfm_restart 285
> +#define __NR_pfm_create_evtsets 286
> +#define __NR_pfm_getinfo_evtsets 287
> +#define __NR_pfm_delete_evtsets 288
> +#define __NR_pfm_unload_context 289
>
> -#define __NR_syscalls 278
> +#define __NR_syscalls 290
>
> #ifdef __KERNEL__
> #define __NR__exit __NR_exit
Hmm, I had sent an earlier patch to paulus that reserves 278 and
279 for spu_run and spu_create and that apparently got dropped.
Could I have those two numbers or is there already an established
user based for the perfmon2 numbers that would take preference?
Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
