> Please send patch. I can't. I don't understand what Nick intends here. If it's obvious to you, hit me with a clue stick, and I'd be glad to patch it. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 3/5] atomic: atomic_inc_not_zero
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
- Re: [patch 3/5] atomic: atomic_inc_not_zero
- References:
- [patches] lockless pagecache prep round 1
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
- [patch 1/5] i386 generic cmpxchg
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
- [patch 2/5] atomic: atomic_cmpxchg
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
- [patch 3/5] atomic: atomic_inc_not_zero
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
- Re: [patch 3/5] atomic: atomic_inc_not_zero
- From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
- Re: [patch 3/5] atomic: atomic_inc_not_zero
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
- [patches] lockless pagecache prep round 1
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 5/12] FS-Cache: Release page->private in failed readahead
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/13] Time: Generic Timeofday Subsystem (v B10)
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 3/5] atomic: atomic_inc_not_zero
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 3/5] atomic: atomic_inc_not_zero
- Index(es):
![]() |