On Monday 14 November 2005 20:17, you wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > > there now is a specification for the broadcom wireless, and a driver is > > being written right now to that specification; and it seems to be > > getting along quite well (it's not ready for primetime use yet but at > > least they can send and receive stuff, which is probably the hardest > > part) > > Goodie. With Broadcom and Intel on-board, we should have most of the > market covered in wireless, and ndiswrappers really should be less of an > argument (it was never an argument for me personally, but for others..). I really hope we get this thing usable in a few weeks. Looks good so far... . However, I did not test the broadcom driver on 4k-stacks, as I only have a G4 with a broadcom card. ;) But I do not expect any problems. -- Greetings Michael.
Attachment:
pgpKvwWbjEgdR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
- References:
- Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
- From: Alex Davis <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/10] Cr4 is valid on some 486s
- Next by Date: [2.6.14.2] Debug: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.c:2459
- Previous by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
- Next by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
- Index(es):
 |