On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 12:24 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >
> > not sure; I do know that it very much helps java (many more threads
> > possible) and the VM (far less order 1 allocs). In addition the 4Kb
> > allocation can be satisfied with the per cpu list of free 4Kb pages,
> > while obviously an order 1 cannot and has to go global.
>
> I realize it has nice advantages in theory, just wondering if anyone has
> done a performance analysis of 4kb vs 8kb stacks lately (or at all?).
I don't think at least anyone at RH has done any; the functionality gain
was already enough for us. One item I missed: in the many-thread cases,
you also save a lot of memory that can now be used for pagecache;
this won't of course be visible in a microbenchmark but should help
system wide.
Also in the implementation I don't see any way 4Kb stacks could show up
in any benchmarks as negative; there are only 4 or 5 extra instructions
in any path, and afaics no cache downsides (in fact the same irq stack
memory is now reused for irqs instead of threadstack-du-jour, so less
footprint/hotter caches)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
