On Sun, 13 Nov 2005, Steve Boak wrote:
> Update...
>
> Just in case someone else comes up with this problem, I found the answer by
> combining all the information (more hints actually) that I gleaned from
> google, and then taking a stab in the dark :-)
>
> The simple fix is to use the cifs filesystem instead of smbfs when mounting
> remote samba shares on a Linux box. Apparently cifs has superceded smbfs and
> works much better in this case, but I still need to use smbfs when mounting
> shares from my windows box. Information is rather hard to find on the subject
> of samba/smbfs/cifs.
smbfs is currently unmaintained and likely to move to depricated status
some time soon, so bug fixes are probably not being done.
I believe CIFS will be recommened for everything and should work for
everything in the near future or already does.
>
> I had to recompile the kernel to get cifs support.
>
> Not sure of the finer details yet, but at least now I have a working system
> again. Here's the combinations I have found that works:
>
> (Note that all my tests were done with at least kernel 2.6.13, Samba 3.0.20b,
> and Debian Testing on both machines)
>
> Linux client mount -t cifs ... shares from Samba server
> Linux client mount -t smbfs ... shares from Windows-2000
> Windows client uses smbfs? shares from Samba server
Interesting to see that this is still a problem in 2.6.13.
Have you tried 2.6.14?
Anyone know the status of CIFS?
Ian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]