Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Actually, what I was thinking is that if you use the swsusp infrastructure to suspend all processes, all dma, quiesce the heck out of the devices, and _then_ try to move the kernel... Well, you at least have a much more controlled problem. Yeah, it's pretty darn intrusive, but if you're doing "suspend to ram" perhaps the downtime could be only 5 or 10 seconds...

I don't think suspend to ram for a memory hotplug remove would be acceptable to users. The other methods add some complexity to the kernel, but are transparent to userspace. Downtime of 5 to 10 seconds is really quite a bit of downtime.

I don't know how much of the problem that leaves unsolved, though.

It would still require a remappable kernel. And seems intuitively to be wrong to me. But if you want to try it out I won't stop you. It might even work.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux