Nikita Danilov wrote:
jmerkey writes:
> Nikita Danilov wrote:
>
> >Jeff V. Merkey writes:
> > >
> > > The subject line speaks for itself. This is using standard VFS readdir
> > > and lookup calls through the VFSwith ftp. Very poor.
> >
> >Reiser4 works fine with 100M entries in a directory, so VFS is not a
> >bottleneck here.
> >
> >
>
> how about with ftp running on top? Try running FTP in directory with
> 100M entries. See how long it takes to return the data to
> the remote client for a dir listing.
Why are you thinking that it is VFS that is causing performance
degradation here?
Because I see the same degredation local vs. remote. My path for readdir
and lookup are short. I dynamically (via math) create
the file names on the fly and lookup simply reads a static table in
memory for inode number. One thing I can check are calls
to igetblk inside of lookup.
Jeff
>
> Jeff
>
> >[...]
> >
> > >
> > > Jeff
> >
Nikita.
> >
> >
> >
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
