On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 08:26:45 +1100, Neil Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sunday November 13, [email protected] wrote: > > > > Kernel is 2.6.14-mm2. > > This is an x86 box, why does it compile raid6altivec*.c ? I suppose it > > does not generate any code, because of some #ifdef magic, but why does > > it build them anyways ? Looks a bit strange. > > It's probably just easier that way. > I guess you could do the following, but I'm not sure that it is really > worth it. > > +raid6-$(CONFIG_X86) := raid6mmx.o raid6sse1.o > +raid6-$(CONFIG_X86_64) := raid6sse2.o plain x86 can also do some sse2 ;) (x2, not x4) As X86_64 also defines plain X86, this could be just > +raid6-$(CONFIG_X86) := raid6mmx.o raid6sse1.o raid6sse2.o And perhaps IA64 will need this also ? Thanks, anyways. I will send it to Andrew, to see if it goes in. by -- J.A. Magallon <jamagallon()able!es> \ Software is like sex: werewolf!able!es \ It's better when it's free Mandriva Linux release 2006.1 (Cooker) for i586 Linux 2.6.14-jam2 (gcc 4.0.2 (4.0.2-1mdk for Mandriva Linux release 2006.1))
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- x86 building altivec for raid ?
- From: "J.A. Magallon" <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 building altivec for raid ?
- From: Neil Brown <[email protected]>
- x86 building altivec for raid ?
- Prev by Date: Re: x86 building altivec for raid ?
- Next by Date: Re: Severe VFS Performance Issues 2.6 with > 95000 directory entries
- Previous by thread: Re: x86 building altivec for raid ?
- Next by thread: Re: x86 building altivec for raid ?
- Index(es):
 |