Re: 2.6.9 reporting 1 Gigabyte/second throughput on bio's, timer skew possible?

[Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>]

On Sat, Nov 12 2005, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> 
> >On Fri, Nov 11 2005, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> > 
> >
> >>I have allocated 393,216 bio buffers I statically maintain in a chain 
> >>and am running the dsfs file system with 3 x gigabit links fully 
> >>saturated.  meta-data
> >>increases the write sizes to 720 MB/Second on dual 9500 controllers with 
> >>8 drives each (total of 16) 7200 RPM Drives.  I am seeing some 
> >>congestion and bursting on the bio chains as they are submitted.  
> >>
> 
> 
> >16 disks on 2 controllers, I'm 100% sure they are lots of people
> >pushing 2.6 much further than that! I wouldn't evne call that a big
> >setup.
> > 
> >
> Probably not for this type of application.
> 
> > 
> >
> >>DSFS dynamically generates html status files form within the file 
> >>system.  When the system gets somewhat behind, I am seeing bursts > 1 
> >>GB/Second which exceeds the theoretical limit of the bus.   I have a 
> >>timer function that runs every second and profiles the I/O throughput 
> >>created by DSFS with bio submissions and captured packets.  I am asking 
> >>if there is clock skew at these data rates with use of the timer 
> >>functions.  The system appears to be sustaining 1GB/Second throughput on 
> >>dual controllers.  I have verified through data rates the system is 
> >>sustaining 800 megabytes/second with these 1GB/S bursts.  I am curious 
> >>if there is potentially timer skew at these higher rates since I am 
> >>having a hard time accepting that I can push 1GB/S through a bus rated 
> >>at only 850 MB/S for DMA based transfers.   The unit is accessible by 
> >>   
> >>
> >
> >Note that the linux io stats accounting in 2.6.9 accounts queued io, not
> >io completions. So it's quite possible to have burst rates > bus speeds
> >for async io. 2.6.15-rc1 change this.
> >
> > 
> >
> So you are willing to log into the unit and validate these numbers? I 
> would like for an
> someone other than me to validate I am seeing these rates.

If you average the bandwidth over a time long enough to eliminate the
bursty queueing rates, your average rage should drop to what the
hardware can actually do. Or dig out the patch from 2.6.15-rc1 for
ll_rw_blk.c and apply it to 2.6.9, find it here:

http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=d72d904a5367ad4ca3f2c9a2ce8c3a68f0b28bf0;hp=d83c671fb7023f69a9582e622d01525054f23b66

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/