An even stranger line: fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c has: aentry = kmalloc(sizeof(a_list_t), GFP_ATOMIC & ~__GFP_HIGH); Given the gfp.h line: #define GFP_ATOMIC (__GFP_VALID | __GFP_HIGH) that xfs_buf line makes no sense. There is almost no chance that the author of that xfs_buf.c line was aware they were spelling the empty gfp flag __GFP_VALID. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH]: Cleanup of __alloc_pages
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
- Re: [PATCH]: Cleanup of __alloc_pages
- From: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
- Re: [PATCH]: Cleanup of __alloc_pages
- References:
- [PATCH]: Cleanup of __alloc_pages
- From: "Rohit, Seth" <rohit.seth@intel.com>
- Re: [PATCH]: Cleanup of __alloc_pages
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
- Re: [PATCH]: Cleanup of __alloc_pages
- From: Rohit Seth <rohit.seth@intel.com>
- Re: [PATCH]: Cleanup of __alloc_pages
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
- Re: [PATCH]: Cleanup of __alloc_pages
- From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
- Re: [PATCH]: Cleanup of __alloc_pages
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
- Re: [PATCH]: Cleanup of __alloc_pages
- From: Rohit Seth <rohit.seth@intel.com>
- Re: [PATCH]: Cleanup of __alloc_pages
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
- Re: [PATCH]: Cleanup of __alloc_pages
- From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
- [PATCH]: Cleanup of __alloc_pages
- Prev by Date: Severe VFS Performance Issues 2.6 with > 95000 directory entries
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] plugsched - update Kconfig-1
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH]: Cleanup of __alloc_pages
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH]: Cleanup of __alloc_pages
- Index(es):
![]() |