>
>Ashok was my patch for the cpufreq driver *that* horrible? Or perhaps
we
>just need to move things like the set_cpus_allowed further up in the
calls
>and handle everything in one location. Interested?
>
I have been on to multiple things recently, I think I saw your post, but
didn't look at it closer.
Yes, moving things higher up would definitely help, especially the
set_cpus_allowed().
We should also do the same for the case where we have the list of
dependent cpus in the mask before calling the lower level functions.
Zwane, if you want to take a shot at it, that would be awesome.. I might
not be able to get to this immediately.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
