Hi Jean,
On Saturday 12 November 2005 15:31, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> > I have added this small fix to my 2.6.14.2 build. A quick question.
>
> Let is be noted that this warning was fixed in a completely different
> way in Linus' tree already. My patch is not meant for -stable either,
> as it doesn't fix any real problem.
I see (or didn't). Isn't it hard to keep up with all this. Kernel developers
are unstoppable... how Linus/Andrew/Alan/all_the_rest keep on top of it all I
don't know - wonderful stuff.
> > What does GCC do here - does it just drop and ignore the unused variable?
>
> Without optimizations, gcc 3.3.6 keeps the variable although it won't
> ever be used. With -O1 and above (including -Os) it drops the unused
> variable.
Thanks! I didn't know that at all.
Nick
--
http://sourceforge.net/projects/quake2plus
"Person who say it cannot be done should not interrupt person doing it."
-Chinese Proverb
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]