On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 10:29:18PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > I think they work fine everywhere. Adrian wants to remove the API they > use. > > I think this is a bad idea. The drivers should be converted. They are - I'll send patches later today... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove ISA legacy functions
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove ISA legacy functions
- References:
- Re: [2.6 patch] add -Werror-implicit-function-declaration to CFLAGS
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] add -Werror-implicit-function-declaration to CFLAGS
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] add -Werror-implicit-function-declaration to CFLAGS
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] add -Werror-implicit-function-declaration to CFLAGS
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] add -Werror-implicit-function-declaration to CFLAGS
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove ISA legacy functions
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove ISA legacy functions
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove ISA legacy functions
- From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove ISA legacy functions
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove ISA legacy functions
- From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] add -Werror-implicit-function-declaration to CFLAGS
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] fix leakes in request_firmware_nowait
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.14-mm2 OOPS - packet writing
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove ISA legacy functions
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove ISA legacy functions
- Index(es):
 |