> No, the pointers are all held in place. Even if everyone else releases
> their references, the commmand still contains a reference to the device
> (which holds it from being released) and the device likewise contains a
> reference to the host.
Ok, then I think it's good to go as far as locking is concerned.
Thanks for the explanation.
Regarding the CISS vs. CCISS in the config variable, is that going
to hold up this patch? I can make a patch to change that, but it's
not really related to this patch, this patch just happens to use
that config variable.
-- steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
