Re: [PATCH] Allow flatmem to be disabled when only sparsemem is implemented

Anton Blanchard wrote:

> On architectures that implement sparsemem but not discontigmem we want
> to be able to hide the flatmem option in some cases. On ppc64 for
> example, when we select NUMA we must not select flatmem.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <[email protected]>

First reaction is that this is very reasonable.  I can see why you need
to do this as you don't have DISCONTIGMEM.  I will just go check the
major architectures and make sure they arn't relying on being able to
enable SPARSEMEM and getting FLATMEM too behaviour.  I don't think they
can be as they all have DISCONTIGMEM and so should be insulated.

-apw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Allow flatmem to be disabled when only sparsemem is implemented
  - From: Andy Whitcroft <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] Allow flatmem to be disabled when only sparsemem is implemented
  - From: Anton Blanchard <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/10] Cr4 is valid on some 486s
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.14] airo.c: add support for IW_ENCODE_TEMP (i.e. xsupplicant)
Previous by thread: [PATCH] Allow flatmem to be disabled when only sparsemem is implemented
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Allow flatmem to be disabled when only sparsemem is implemented
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]