Re: 2.6.14.1/2 patch Makefile hunk FAILED

[Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net>]

On Friday 11 November 2005 11:48, Nick Warne wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Just an eyes-up here - applying the combined 2.6.14.1/2 patch from
> kernel.org

I had no such problems here.  My script patches 2.6.14 to 2.6.14.1, then
to 2.6.14.2.  It built and I'm running it right now.

I don't believe the .2 patch I saved from the email includes the .1
patch.  I didn't get the bz2 version however, so it could be combined. 
Somone else will have to clarify that.

>
>http://www.kernel.org/diff/diffview.cgi?file=%2Fpub%2Flinux%2Fkernel%2F
>v2.6%2Fincr%2Fpatch-2.6.14.1-2.bz2
>
>produces REJ on Makefile when applied to virgin 2.6.14 as EXTRAVERSION
>isn't .1:
>
>
>***************
>*** 1,7 ****
>  VERSION = 2
>  PATCHLEVEL = 6
>  SUBLEVEL = 14
>- EXTRAVERSION = .1
>  NAME=Affluent Albatross
>
>  # *DOCUMENTATION*
>--- 1,7 ----
>  VERSION = 2
>  PATCHLEVEL = 6
>  SUBLEVEL = 14
>+ EXTRAVERSION = .2
>  NAME=Affluent Albatross
>
>  # *DOCUMENTATION*
>
>
>
>Simple to fix manually though.
>
>Nick

-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
99.36% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Free OpenDocument reader/writer/converter download:
http://www.openoffice.org
Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above
message by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/