Re: [patch 1/1] cpufreq_conservative/ondemand: invert meaning of 'ignore nice'

[Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>]

On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 04:00, Alexander Clouter wrote:
> The use of the 'ignore_nice' sysfs file is confusing to anyone using it.
> This removes the sysfs file 'ignore_nice' and in its place creates a
> 'ignore_nice_load' entry which defaults to '0'; meaning nice'd processes
> *are* counted towards the 'business' caclulation.

My 'nice'd compiles thank you from the bottom of their little cc1 hearts for 
changing your mind.

Cheers,
Con

Attachment: pgpj7EinV2aXf.pgp
Description: PGP signature