Hi Christoph On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 08:55, Christoph Lameter wrote: > Currently the slab allocator uses a page_state counter called nr_slab. > The VM swap prefetch code assumes that this describes the number of pages > used on a node by the slab allocator. However, that is not really true. > > Currently nr_slab is the number of total pages allocated which may > be local or remote pages. Remote allocations may artificially inflate > nr_slab and therefore disable swap prefetching. Thanks for pointing this out. > This patch splits the counter into the nr_local_slab which reflects > slab pages allocated from the local zones (and this number is useful > at least as a guidance for the VM) and the remotely allocated pages. How large a contribution is the remote slab size likely to be? Would this information be useful to anyone potentially in future code besides swap prefetch? The nature of prefetch is that this is only a fairly coarse measure of how full the vm is with data we don't want to displace. Thus it is also not important that it is very accurate. Unless the remote slab size can be a very large contribution, or having local and remote slab sizes is useful potentially to some other code I'm inclined to say this is unnecessary. A simple comment saying something like "the nr_slab estimation is artificially elevated by remote slab pages on numa, however this contribution is not important to the accuracy of this algorithm". Of course it is nice to be more accurate and if you think worthwhile then we can do this - I'll be happy to be guided by your judgement. As a side note I doubt any serious size numa hardware will ever be idle enough by swap prefetch standards to even start prefetching swap pages. If you think hardware of this sort is likely to benefit from swap prefetch then perhaps we should look at relaxing the conditions under which prefetching occurs. Cheers, Con
Attachment:
pgp7u6VDeGIFt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC, PATCH] Slab counter troubles with swap prefetch?
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC, PATCH] Slab counter troubles with swap prefetch?
- References:
- [RFC, PATCH] Slab counter troubles with swap prefetch?
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- [RFC, PATCH] Slab counter troubles with swap prefetch?
- Prev by Date: Re: [x86_64] 2.6.14-git13 mplayer fails with "v4l2: ioctl queue buffer failed: Bad address" (2 Nov 2005, 11 Nov 2005)
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC, PATCH] Slab counter troubles with swap prefetch?
- Previous by thread: [RFC, PATCH] Slab counter troubles with swap prefetch?
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC, PATCH] Slab counter troubles with swap prefetch?
- Index(es):