J.A. Magallon writes:
[...]
> >
> > However, if the code is as follows:
> > void foo (void) {
> > int myvar = 0;
> > printf("%d\n", myvar);
> > bar(&myvar);
> > printf("%d\n", myvar);
> > }
> > If bar is declared in _another_ file as
> > void bar (const int * var);
> > then I think the compiler can validly cache the value of 'myvar' for the
> > second printf without re-reading it. Correct/incorrect?
> >
>
> Nope. You can't trust bar() not doing something like
>
> bar(const int* local_var)
> {
> ... use local_var as ro...
> extern int myvar;
> myvar = 7;
> }
>
> For the compiler to do that, you must tag bar() with attribute(pure).
extern declaration in your version of bar() cannot refer to the
automatic variable myvar in foo().
>
> --
> J.A. Magallon <jamagallon()able!es> \ Software is like sex:
> werewolf!able!es \ It's better when it's free
> Mandriva Linux release 2006.1 (Cooker) for i586
> Linux 2.6.14-jam1 (gcc 4.0.2 (4.0.2-1mdk for Mandriva Linux release 2006.1))
Nikita.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]