On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > yuck. What is the real problem btw? AFAICS there's enough space for a > 2-word spinlock in struct page for pagetables. Yes. There is no real problem. But my patch offends good taste. Hugh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock
- References:
- [PATCH 00/15] mm: struct page lock and counts
- From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock
- From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock
- From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 00/15] mm: struct page lock and counts
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 17/39] NLKD/i386 - core adjustments
- Next by Date: ocf-linux-20051110 - Asynchronous Crypto support for linux
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock
- Index(es):
 |