Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote: > > Well plan B is to kill spinlock_t.break_lock. And plan C is to use a bit_spinlock() against page->flags. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock
- References:
- [PATCH 00/15] mm: struct page lock and counts
- From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock
- From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock
- From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 00/15] mm: struct page lock and counts
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock
- Next by Date: Re: latest mtd changes broke collie
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock
- Index(es):