Re: [PATCH 12/18] shared mount handling: bind and rbind

On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 11:54:36AM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> Shouldn't this check go before copy_tree()?  Not much point in copying
> the tree if we are sure it won't be used.

Incorrect.  Propagation nodes further down the tree can very well be
mountable.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 12/18] shared mount handling: bind and rbind
  - From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 12/18] shared mount handling: bind and rbind
  - From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 12/18] shared mount handling: bind and rbind
  - From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [PATCH 39/39] NLKD/x86-64 - Remote Debug Agent
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 13/18] shared mounts handling: move
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 12/18] shared mount handling: bind and rbind
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 12/18] shared mount handling: bind and rbind
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]