Re: [PATCH] i386: don't blindly enable interrupts in die()

"Jan Beulich" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>  Rather than blindly re-enabling interrupts in die(), save their state
>  upon entry and then restore that state.

What is the reason for this change?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] i386: don't blindly enable interrupts in die()
  - From: "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] i386: don't blindly enable interrupts in die()
  - From: "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] minor ELF addition
Next by Date: Re: athlon x2 + 2.6.14 + SMP = fast clock
Previous by thread: [PATCH] i386: don't blindly enable interrupts in die()
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386: don't blindly enable interrupts in die()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]