Re: [PATCH] i386: fix bound check IDT gate

On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 05:50:37PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Other than apparently commonly assumed, the bound instruction does not
> require the corresponding IDT entry to have DPL 3.
> 
> From: Jan Beulich <[email protected]>

Shouldn't this be "Signed-off-by:" instead?

> (actual patch attached)

Can you put it in-line?

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] i386: fix bound check IDT gate
  - From: "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] i386: make trap information available to die handlers
Next by Date: Re: Compatible fstat()
Previous by thread: [PATCH] i386: fix bound check IDT gate
Next by thread: please pull from the trivial tree
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]