On Nov 08, Rusty Russell <[email protected]> wrote: > The current simple fix for that (thanks Pozsar!) is to poll while a > module we rely on is still loading as indicated in /proc/modules. This > fix will be needed to cover existing kernels, even if we were to get > fancy in new kernels. I have *not* been able to verify this, but at least two people still reported problems after using this patch. -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- References:
- 2.6.14, udev: unknown symbols for ehci_hcd
- From: Harald Dunkel <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.14, udev: unknown symbols for ehci_hcd
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.14, udev: unknown symbols for ehci_hcd
- From: Harald Dunkel <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.14, udev: unknown symbols for ehci_hcd
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.14, udev: unknown symbols for ehci_hcd
- From: [email protected] (Marco d'Itri)
- Re: 2.6.14, udev: unknown symbols for ehci_hcd
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.14, udev: unknown symbols for ehci_hcd
- From: Pozsar Balazs <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.14, udev: unknown symbols for ehci_hcd
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- 2.6.14, udev: unknown symbols for ehci_hcd
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/7]: PCI revised (3) [PATCH 16/42]: PCI: PCI Error reporting callbacks
- Next by Date: [UPDATED,PATCH 1/1] My tools break here
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.14, udev: unknown symbols for ehci_hcd
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.14, udev: unknown symbols for ehci_hcd
- Index(es):