Re: 3D video card recommendations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/7/05, Gerhard Mack <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
> > Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:31:35 -0800
> > From: Mark Knecht <[email protected]>
> > To: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Gerhard Mack <[email protected]>, LKML <[email protected]>,
> >     Xavier Bestel <[email protected]>,
> >     Alan Cox <[email protected]>, Hugo Mills <[email protected]>,
> >     Nix <[email protected]>, Anshuman Gholap <[email protected]>,
> >     Diego Calleja <[email protected]>,
> >     Toon van der Pas <[email protected]>, [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: 3D video card recommendations
> >
> > On 11/7/05, Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 10:01 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > >
> > > Mark thanks for the update.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Steven,
> > > >   Hi . I run my ATI PCI_Express card on a 64-bit kernel. (2.6.14-rt6)
> > > > It works fine for my needs, although as I said earlier my glxgears
> > > > numbers are nothing to shout about:
> > > >
> > > > 0000:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV370
> > > > 5B60 [Radeon X300 (PCIE)]
> > > > 0000:01:00.1 Display controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV370 [Radeon X300SE]
> > > >
> > > > mark@lightning ~ $ glxgears
> > > > Xlib:  extension "XFree86-DRI" missing on display ":0.0".
> > > > 3170 frames in 5.0 seconds = 634.000 FPS
> > > > 3416 frames in 5.0 seconds = 683.200 FPS
> > > > 3294 frames in 5.0 seconds = 658.800 FPS
> > >
> > > These aren't too shabby, but then again compared to my NVidia (non-rt
> > > obviously) with their binary driver):
> > >
> > > 0000:01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV40 [GeForce
> > > 6800 GT] (rev a1)
> > >
> > > $ glxgears
> > > 49961 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9992.200 FPS
> > > 48599 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9719.800 FPS
> > > 55592 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11118.400 FPS
> > > 47395 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9479.000 FPS
> > >
> > > What do you get with the ATI binary driver?
> >
> > Last time I tried (circa 2.6.14-rc3-rtX) it didn't load correctly.
> > Note that this was the ati-drivers package from portage and not an ATI
> > driver package from ATI so possibly that was part of the problem.
> >
> > I should probably try again one of these days but high speed graphics
> > are not an issue for me on this machine. It's used for audio work
> > mostly.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Mark
>
> Not worth trying. I spent a couple weeks with ATI tech support trying to
> get it working with no luck.  It can work with a 32 bit kernel with some
> patching but won't work at all with a 64 bit kernel.
>
>         Gerhard

Thanks. I was just looking at emerge output and wondering if I wanted
to mess with this. I didn't, but now I have a good reason!

Thanks,
Mark
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux