I notice that arch/v850/kernel/irq.c has been updated with a
"show_interrupts" function; in this function it contains the following
bit of code:
if (i == 0) {
seq_puts(p, " ");
for (i=0; i < 1 /*smp_num_cpus*/; i++)
seq_printf(p, "CPU%d ", i);
seq_putc(p, '\n');
}
if (i < NR_IRQS) {
... show interrupt i ...
} else if (i == NR_IRQS)
seq_printf(p, "ERR: %10lu\n", irq_err_count);
where "i" is iterated (by procfs) from 0...NR_IRQS.
On the v850, irq 0 is a real interrupt, so this doesn't really work
properly -- it doesn't display an entry for irq 0.
Is it now illegal for irq 0 to be a real interrupt (was it illegal before)?
Or is the procfs code just bogus?
Thanks,
-miles
--
Occam's razor split hairs so well, I bought the whole argument!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
