Hi Adrian,
Adrian Bunk wrote:
ifdef CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE
-CFLAGS += -Os
+CFLAGS += -O
else
CFLAGS += -O2
endif
Sees this undoes part of the benefit, perhaps you should add a
third option.
Even further, I don't see any reason for using -O - the resulting code
is expected to be both bigger and slower than with -Os.
Is this a workaround for a gcc bug on some platform?
Yes, extacly, it is. See other post on this for more details.
Still shouldn't be here though.
Regards
Greg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer -- Chief Software Dude EMAIL: [email protected]
SnapGear -- a CyberGuard Company PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888
825 Stanley St, FAX: +61 7 3891 3630
Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
