Re: Fwd: [RFC] IRQ type flags

On Sul, 2005-11-06 at 22:16 +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > This is actually true of some x86 hardware in the EISA space where there
> > is a control register for level v edge that we sort of half deal with.
> 
> Thanks Alan.  Can I assume you're happy with the patch, even if x86
> currently ignores the flags?

I'm certainly happy with it. Both the APIC and EISA IRQ control
registers could even be made to honour it if anyone ever needed to.

Should platforms that don't support the flags be patched to error
requests they don't support however ?

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Fwd: [RFC] IRQ type flags
    • From: Russell King <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Fwd: [RFC] IRQ type flags
    • From: Russell King <[email protected]>
  • Re: Fwd: [RFC] IRQ type flags
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: Fwd: [RFC] IRQ type flags
    • From: Russell King <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: hostap interrupt problems, maintainers unresponsive - "wifi0: interrupt delivery does not seem to work"
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] mm: poison struct page for ptlock
• Previous by thread: Re: Fwd: [RFC] IRQ type flags
• Next by thread: Re: Fwd: [RFC] IRQ type flags
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]