On Saturday 05 November 2005 02:15, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On 11/4/05, Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > You lost me... We have a scenario when a PNP driver is bound to a PNP
> > > device that does not support deactivation. Looking at the proposed PNP
> > > bus suspend code presence of such device will cause suspend process to
> > > fail. Are you saying this is what you want?
> > >
> >
> > Ugh, scratch whatever I wrote earlier. Such devices should be marked
> > with RES_DO_NOT_CHANEG so everything is fine.
> >
> > Sorry about the noise.
>
> So... You're OK with the patch as proposed?
>
Yes I am.
--
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
