Re: [PATCH] [MMC] Use controller id instead of driver name for printks

On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 01:07:32PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> The printks that aren't for debugging should use the name of the controller,
> not the driver name. Multiple MMC controllers aren't that common today, but
> this is the right way to do things.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>

Applied, thanks.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] [MMC] Use controller id instead of driver name for printks
    • From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: New Linux Development Model
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] [DRIVER MODEL] Fix depca
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] [MMC] Use controller id instead of driver name for printks
• Next by thread: [2.6 patch] fs/freevxfs/: add #include's
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]