Re: [PATCH] kill 8139too kernel thread (sorta)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:47:19PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Here's a better version, that uses cancel_rearming_...

Yep it certainly solves the race condition.

> +	if (rtnl_shlock_nowait() == 0) {
>  		rtl8139_thread_iter (dev, tp, tp->mmio_addr);
>  		rtnl_unlock ();
>  	}
>  
> -	complete_and_exit (&tp->thr_exited, 0);
> +	schedule_delayed_work(&tp->thread, next_tick);

My only concern is the potential for starvation here should we fail
to obtain the RTNL.  Since any local user can hold the RTNL by issuing
rtnetlink requests, it is theoretically possible for the rtl8139 work
to be delayed indefinitely.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[email protected]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux