Rohit Seth wrote:
Nick, sorry for not responding earlier.
That's OK.
I agree that it is slight change in behavior from original. I doubt
though it will impact any one in any negative way (may be for some
higher order allocations if at all). On a little positive side, less
frequent calls to kswapd for some cases and clear up the code a little
bit.
I really don't want a change of behaviour going in with this,
especially not one which I would want to revert anyway. But
don't get hung up with it - when you post your latest patch
I will make a patch for the changes I would like to see for it
and synch things up.
But I really don't want to get stuck here. The pcp traversal and
flushing is where I want to go next.
Sure, hope it goes well!
Nick
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
